Gustaf Aulen’s classic work, ‘Christus Victor’, has long been a standard text on the atonement. Aulen applies “history of ideas’ methodology to historical theology. The term Christus Victor comes from the title of Gustaf Aulén’s groundbreaking book 1st published in ’31 which drew attention to early Church understanding of. Read “Christus Victor” by Gustaf Aulén with Rakuten Kobo. Dr. Aulén is Professor of Systematic Theology in the University of Lund, and this book is a translation.
|Published (Last):||13 November 2004|
|PDF File Size:||8.35 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Language for God in Patristic Tradition. Aulen helped us recover the patriots and Luther’s view.
A Review of Gustaf Aulén’s Christus Victor – Kirk Miller Blog
Many times I had to set the book down and just think for several minutes before moving on to the next paragraph. In whom was it possible for us lawless and ungodly men to aullen been justified, save only in the Son of God? If the Incarnation is a vital part of Christ atonement, as Irenaeus shows in the “classical” view, why is this passage entirely missing in any of the accounts of atonement, especially in the “classical” view?
Reading Gustaf Aulen’s classic study of the atonement, I learned that if I had grown up in the s during the heyday of liberal Christianity, I mig My whole life as a Christian, I have struggled with the central story of the auen The work of Christ is first and foremost a victory over the powers which hold mankind in bondage: The Eucharistic Communion and the World.
He is the actor at all times By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. I’ve grown up with penal substitionary atonement being the only way of understanding the work of Christ and have now found much more depth and beauty in this classic idea.
Catholic University of America Press, ], You can read this item using any of the following Kobo apps and devices: The Latin views incorporate merit and penance in the atonment model. I realize I can’t understand the historical significance of this work, but given my reformed background, it definitely is making me think.
Christus Victor – Wikipedia
At Kobo, we try to ensure that published reviews do not contain rude or profane language, spoilers, or any of our reviewer’s personal information. It is very helpful in adding to or helping you develop your theology on the atonement. Most Western Christians Protestant and Roman do not know that their understanding of the cross is only one of the Christian views of the cross.
For Us and for Our Salvation. Retrieved from ” https: Account Options Sign in. The idea of purchase at a price is foreign to the classical view held by the Greek Fathers.
Mar 29, Eli rated it really liked it.
His treatment of Christian history is insightful fustaf there is no doubt he knowledge of it and the significant contributors is brilliantly broad. O the sweet exchange, O the inscrutable creation, O the unexpected benefits; that the iniquity of many should be concealed in One Righteous Man, and the righteousness of One should ggustaf many that are iniquitous!
University of Oxford, Finally, there are too many excellent asides and thoughtful supporting points made to mention.
I’d like more thoughts on how specifically a reformed atonement theology can be recast to allow for classic atonement theology, but that’s not really his project, so I’ll have to go vichor for that. Is not “‘being able aulej die’ subject to sacrifice” the birth of human subject prior to, beyond, or otherwise than being? Megan rated it it was amazing Mar 02, It seems to have a few holes, here and there, but still well done and enjoyable.
For Aulen, this move removes the work of God from the work of Christ in redemption. In the satisfaction model, God becomes man in order to pay the penalty due sinful humanity. Seven Exegetical Works, trans. Very good – read to understand what the earliest Chrisitans believed christuz the atonement.
Nov 02, Steve rated it liked it. His true manhood receives full emphasis. Gustaf Aulen’s classic work, ‘Christus Victor’, has long been a standard text on the atonement.
Within the subjectivist camp, this human dilemma—the imperfection of humanity—is understood in different ways resulting in different views of how Christ meets that human need His argument from the Fathers particularly of Sts. This Dualism is an altogether radical opposition, but it is not an absolute Dualism; for in the scriptural view evil has not an eternal existence 5, n.
It’s definitely a prerequisite for any apologetic for or against it or for or against the other views. What do we do with Christus Victor? How else could the death of Christ deliver men from the wrath of God and overcome of the powers? Although we may find crumbs here and there of atonement theologizing prior to Anselm, he is the first person to articulate a fully thought out theory of atonement; and it just so happened to be the Latin type But the books merits include the fact that it finally back in chdistus a taxonomy on how to think through different ideas of the atonement.
If men cannot do it, then God christjs do it. Man had been created by God that he might have life. Did not Christ come to fulfill the Law by becoming a burnt offering himself, as prescribed in Leviticus chapters 1 and 4?
Starting with Irenaeus early 2nd century as one of the earliest chrustus clearest examples of the ‘classic idea’ “The Word of God, who is God Himself, has entered in under the conditions of sin and death, to take up the conflict with the powers of evil and carry it through This was a fantastic read! The Bondage of the Will, The Legends of Genesis: A Theology of Grace in Six Controversies.